| |
Sermon
Search
Creekside Church
Sermon of December
27, 1998
"Christ is
Born! Now What?"
Matthew
2:13-23
|
Guest Preacher
This Week:
Nelda Risden
Church Member
|
|
|
|
Once
upon a time I was a history major at Oklahoma City University.
In my senior year I took a night course on Westward Expansion
under history professor D. Duane Cummins. The course had a
somewhat different approach; instead of lecture, each 1-hour
class session would consist of six oral book reports of 15
minutes each. I'm not sure how many books we each had to read,
but I remember only two. One was on THE LONGHORNS by J. Frank
Dobie. It was memorable because of my stumble-into-it flair
for drama. You see, I had a good friend named Claudia who
had flame red hair, a wonderful Texas drawl and an irreverent
approach to nearly everything, including the "Hallelujah Chorus".
Even better, as a true Texan, she had this adorable stuffed
orange longhorn steer! My idea appealed to her own march to
a different drummer, and so as I began my report and came
to my first reference to the physical traits of the Texas
longhorn, I swept my little orange friend out of my brown
bag and raised him high for all to peruse. Luck was with me.
Dr. Cummins liked it. That was a risky decision for me to
make since I really didn't know Dr. C. all that well, but
when I get inspired to have a little fun, sometimes it's hard
for me to pass up the chance despite fear of the possible
consequences.
I must
confess that I'd already had occasion to sense that such
a silly ploy might fly with the good Dr. Cummins. Let's
flash back to the first session of class. We were given
a sheet listing the dates of the classes and the names of
the 6 books to be reported on in each session. Dr. Cummins
proceeded to read off each book title assigning a volunteer
to read and report on it. I quickly scanned all the titles
and saw on the list this very book I'm holding now-THE AMERICAN
FRONTIER by William Gee White and none other than D. Duane
Cummins himself.
My
mind was working at warp speed and in a matter of mere nano-seconds,
I came to one of many possible conclusions. Someone had
to read and report verbally on the Prof.'s own book. That
someone, if the report is done well, stands the chance of
making a big time impression and getting said Prof. in that
someone's corner for the rest of the semester. Furthermore,
I concluded that everyone else in the class had by now come
to the same conclusion and that all would be ready to wave
their hands high the instant he read that book title.
Mentally,
I imposed one further conclusion on the group, that none
of us wanted to be the one assigned to that particular book
because none of us believed we could give a report good
enough to impress the author. But we also did not want to
be left looking like we had something against reading his
book, I decided, so I determined that we had all by now
calculated that the odds of being the one called on in a
sea of 30 or so waving hands were minimal and worth the
risk.
Having
concluded all of my conclusions on the subject, I figured
I had to take the risk along with everyone else. So when
Dr. Cummins read off "THE AMERICAN FRONTIER", my eager hand
shot up in the air. I glanced around to see...all the other
students virtually sitting on their hands for fear the Prof.
might interpret even a twitching finger as a desire to volunteer.
Evidently my mind had worked so fast, none of the other
had any idea yet what conclusion they should have reached
and acted upon by now.
As
the heat of my red face slowly faded away, I figured I'd
better make the most of it and give it my best effort. I
needn't have worried, even though the Prof. had me sit facing
him no more than 4 feet away as I began my report. In only
a few minutes, some particular reference that I made caught
Dr. Cummins' fancy and he proceeded to use the entire balance
of the hour and a half to tell us about his adventure researching
the book out west on the Oregon Trail. I didn't say another
word, and he was so impressed, he gave me an "A". That's
why I had the courage to take the little orange longhorn
to class.
That's
a long story to illustrate a point, but it is representative
of the fact that the way we make decisions is almost like
breathing. It happens hundreds of times a day and we aren't
even aware of most of them unless one goes bad or becomes
life changing or life threatening.
Joseph
was no different. We don't have a record of most of the
decisions he made, but we do have a record of the most life
affecting ones. We know he had made a decision to wed Mary
and that upon finding her pregnant without benefit of marriage,
he temporarily decided against it. Being the dreaming entertainer
of angels that he was, he regained proper perspective and
followed through on his earlier commitment to take Mary
as his wife. It may well have been a life or death decision
for Mary since a perfectly acceptable punishment for someone
in her condition back then was death by stoning, a most
extreme yet effective method of abortion.
Even
if Mary wouldn't have been stoned, Joseph's choice certainly
altered their lives in a radical way, as did Mary's earlier
choice to say "yes" to God's messenger.
In
today's text we find Joseph approached in another dream
by a divine travel agent who gave him a command to move
to Egypt. But even a command is no more than an emphatic
choice. The options he faced were likely not very appealing
either way. Become a fugitive in a foreign country or let
his young son be slaughtered with the rest. He never seemed
to doubt what the consequences would be nor what he needed
to choose.
This
dream follows the departure of the Magi who were warned
in another dream not to return to Herod but to take a long
detour to return home. Their decision to do so apparently
bought the holy family some valuable time. It also bought
a death sentence for dozens of harmless little boys, the
"slaughter of the innocents" as it's known. This story is
as gut wrenching as any in the Bible, so why would only
Matthew choose to include it in his gospel? It's certainly
not one that I would choose to include in my own account
of the good news of Jesus Christ. It seems to make more
sense not to include a story of an event that saved the
life of the Prince of Peace thereby opening the door for
Herod to mass murder dozens of toddlers. So just why did
Matthew include it?
You
may remember that a key purpose for Matthew's gospel was
to demonstrate in any number of ways that Jesus was the
fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy. His target audience
consisted of Jews. He was attempting to prove to them that
Jesus was the Messiah because he was all that Old Testament
prophecy said the Messiah would be. A phrase Matthew uses
as often as 16 times and that David read twice in verses
15 and 23 of today's text is, "All this was done that it
might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet saying..."
The
flight of the holy family to Egypt is in a sense a reverse
account of the exodus. Where God's people fled Egypt to
escape cruelty and gain freedom, Jesus must now escape to
Egypt for the same reason. Like Moses as a baby, Jesus escaped
a death sentence by means of drastic action taken by his
parents. Pharaoh first and later, Herod put out a contract
on the lives of baby boys. Both Moses and Jesus lived in
exile until they learned that the one seeking their execution
had himself died.
One
writer suggests that Matthew put the account of the slaughter
in the story of Jesus' exile to illustrate that when he
returns, Jesus will be taking on bigger fish than Herod.
His sights will be set on Herod's "boss"-Death itself. (Commentary
section of "Homiletics", Nov.-Dec., 1998)
Until
this year I harbored the fantasy that Christmas was intended
to be a feel-good time when suffering, tragedy and pain
weren't supposed to intrude. That they often did intrude
I was well aware, but I chose to view Christmas and its
aftermath with a pristine perspective. I put the meaning
of Christ's birth on a pedestal supported by nothing more
than whatever emotional well-being I'd managed to maintain
through the overindulgences of the season. I offset those
with the mellowing effects of snow, Christmas music, lights
and decorations, and the warm glow that remained with me
temporarily after gatherings of family, friends and church.
The end result wasn't much more than status quo, no better
and no worse than before.
Events
have gotten my attention this year like never before-events
shaped by the choices people made seemingly without the
benefit of God's guidance. Reminiscent of a book title,
MEETING JESUS AGAIN FOR THE FIRST TIME, I began exploring
the question of who Jesus is for me even before our Sunday
school class began to study it this quarter. Thereby came
the question, "Christ is born! Now what?"
God
gave us a Gift-a super-colossal, one-of-a-kind, awesome,
mind-boggling, heart-warming, non-returnable, it's-a-keeper,
kind of Gift. The Gift that keeps on giving. The perfect
Gift for someone who has everything, or thinks he does.
God gave us His Son, His First Born, His Pride and Joy,
His Hope for the future.
David's
message last Sunday about God Himself becoming vulnerable
had a powerful impact on me, and I thank him for it. Imagine
how vulnerable you'd feel giving the most precious gift,
your child, to humanity. Imagine what it would be like to
love the rest of humanity so much that you would willingly
give your child away as a gift to let the human race know
how much you care. I'm not sure we are capable of imagining
something that big, and for you smart alecs who are saying
that there are days when giving your child away wouldn't
be such a bad idea, I can sympathize. Having no child of
my own, I've substituted in my imagination a super neat
27-year-old man who happens to be my nephew. I remember
a time when he gave new and tortuous meaning to the phrase
"terrible twos". But he became a kind, considerate, interesting
person made doubly precious to me by various life circumstances,
and I cannot wrap my feeble mind around the idea of giving
him to all of you, much less the rest of human kind.
God
may have been vulnerable but he wasn't stupid. He knew what
we were likely to do with His Gift. He knew we might use
him for a while, tire of him, and discard him after tearing
him apart. He knew He was entrusting this most precious
child of His to a world where even at Christmas presidents
are impeached. Even at Christmas a woman 5-months pregnant
with a 3-year-old child can be abandoned without warning
by a stranger wearing the face of a faithful husband and
loving daddy; a woman can be used, abused, and discarded
by her own sister. Even at Christmas nations are bombed
and young, personable, caring public servants are shot dead
just trying to do their jobs.
Those
events, some experienced only through the media, are what
got my attention this Christmas. It takes an awful lot sometimes
to get my attention. The message I got was that Christmas,
Christ's birth, is as much, or more, about tragedy and pain
as it is about happy times and feeling good. You see, Christmas
was a failure for me if I came out of it without feeling
warm, cozy and gooey about all the "feel good" highlights
of the season. And of course by those standards, Christmas
could not continue to measure up. So a number of years ago,
it began to slide into the abyss of false expectations.
The giving of the most precious, unique Gift ever given
could never meet those expectations because they were too
shallow and meaningless.
I COULDN'T
RECEIVE THE GIFT.
I was
looking in the wrong direction and with poor timing to boot.
It's kind of like my bedroom which yesterday I dubbed the
"Lost and Found Dept." (See Margaret, I told you I could
make a sermon illustration out of it.) In my bedroom is
a lot of, for want of a better term, stuff. Unlike the commercial
where a now well-organized family whines in unison, "We
need more stuff," I most assuredly do NOT. As a result,
I am prone to lose things in there- little things mostly
like earrings or pills, but not always. This week I lost
two pairs of scissors. Every time I lose something I look
for it for a while, then I relax because I know that as
soon as I lose something else, I'll find what I lost today,
just like I found both scissors while looking for something
else. I just don't look in the right place at the right
time.
At
Christmas I've been gazing in the wrong directions and only
glancing toward Jesus. He is in the heart of the bombings,
the murders, the accusations of betrayal, the abandonments
and the abuses. He is the one we bomb, murder, accuse, abandon
and abuse. God knew that and gave him to us anyway. Jesus
knew that and gave himself anyway.
What
wondrous love is this? How shall we receive the Gift?
Will
we try to receive Christ by making a list of bad habits
we resolve to change? Now that Christmas is over will we
sigh with relief that things can get back to normal and
live 1999 as if nothing has changed? Or will we recognize
that with Christ born anew in our hearts, nothing will ever
be the same?
Did
Christmas mean nothing more than a bigger credit card debt
to pay off and hundreds of evergreen needles to excavate
out of the carpet? Or did it fill your soul with such joy
and gratitude that your New Year's resolutions can be jettisoned
because you know that you have only one thing to change-that
henceforth you will live as if your very life depends on
Christ?
Of
all the choices we make, this one is most critical. The
lesson that Joseph's choices teach us is that we have to
see past the lights, sounds, smells and warm fuzzies of
Christmas celebrations that blind us to where Christ will
be found-he's there in the raw grief of families torn apart
by abandonment, abuse, infidelity and murder; he's there
in the accusations, public humiliations, ruined reputations
and mass destruction by people who, as Stewart Udall has
said, "...confused power with greatness." And he is here
in the torment of loss, the worry of making ends meet, the
anxiety of declining health, the pain of separation, and
the stresses of daily living that threaten to overpower
our best intentions and engulf our weakened spirits. He's
here just as he was in Bethlehem among the slaughtered innocents.
In
the movie "City of Joy" Patrick Swayze plays a doctor who,
unable to save a little girl's life, fled to Calcutta. Confronted
with the overwhelming poverty and oppression in an area
of the city know as the "City of Joy", his instinct is to
run again. To a dedicated Sister Joan whose love and compassion
for the poor is obvious, he intones: "I quit! I will not
be invested in these people with their needs and their clinging
and their desperation. It's just too damn painful!" Joan
responded softly, "Maybe the world is meant to break your
heart. From the moment we're born we're shipwrecked, struggling
between hope and despair-all of us."
E.
Annie Prouix wrote, "You think you can love without pain?
Love without hurt? Love without rejection? Love without
betrayal? If a bird with a broken neck could fly, what else
might be possible? It may be that love sometimes occurs
without pain or misery."
In
his book LEAP OVER A WALL Eugene Peterson writes:
At the
point that God's revelation becomes total and focused in
Jesus, the Gospel writers take particular pains to make
sure that we don't lose touch with the human. They insist
on Jesus' real birth and real death, Jesus' eating of plain
bread and speaking of plain words. But even so, it isn't
easy to keep a grip on the human, for the birth was a virgin
birth, the death was succeeded by a glorious resurrection,
and there were a number of indisputably supernatural works
that are a very natural part of the story. In the case of
Jesus, human isn't just human.
The
Evangelists' first task, of course, is to give witness
that Jesus is God-with-us, "who for us and for our salvation
came down from heaven."
The
Gospel writers, having gotten us in touch with God in
Jesus, now have to do their level best to keep us in touch
with who we are in Jesus-our human selves. God doesn't
take shortcuts to heaven, by passing our troublesome humanity;
and we had better not try either.
The
entire meaning of the incarnation is that God enters our
human condition, embraces it, and comes to where we are
to save us.
As
we consider what paths we will take in the approaching year,
Christmas confronts us with the same 3 options that the
doctor in "City of Joy" faced. Paul Borthwick cited these:
"You can run. You can watch. Or you can commit to getting
involved with compassionate response."
How
will we receive the Gift?
All of the sermons
that have appeared in text form on our Web Site since August 1996
are available here in the On-Line version. Use the search engine
below to find the sermon you want. You may search by date, sermon
title, or content. The sermons are full-text searchable.
|
|